
When Neurodiversity Gets Expensive: The Cost of Misunderstanding at Work
Most neurodiversity-related issues in the workplace don’t start out as “big problems”.
They start small.
A team member going quiet in meetings.
A manager unsure how to respond to fluctuating performance.
Someone masking their stress until it spills over into absence, burnout, or conflict.
Across every sector - public, private, SME, corporate - I see the same pattern repeating itself. Not because organisations don’t care, but because they don’t feel confident enough to act.
And so nothing happens.
The Hidden Cost of Doing Nothing
There’s an unspoken reality in many workplaces:
Managers are afraid to get it wrong.
They’re expected to support difference, inclusion, wellbeing, and performance - often without being given the language, frameworks, or guidance to do so safely. In a culture where mistakes can quickly turn into blame, scrutiny, or formal process, doing nothing can feel like the safest option.
But this is where the real cost sits.
Because most neurodiversity issues only become expensive when they’re misunderstood.
When early signals are missed or avoided, organisations eventually find themselves dealing with:
long-term absence
formal grievances
performance management processes
disengagement and quiet quitting
or the loss of capable, skilled people who simply leave
By the time support is put in place, the situation has often escalated far beyond where it needed to.
Managers Aren’t the Problem — The System Is
One of the biggest myths in this space is that managers are resistant or uncaring.
In reality, most managers I work with want to do the right thing. They just don’t want to cause harm, say the wrong thing, or open a situation they don’t feel equipped to manage.
They’re operating in a system that often says:
“Support your people”
but doesn’t show them how
and doesn’t always protect them when they try
Without clear, written guidance, managers are left stuck between intention and fear.
Retention Problems Are Often Inclusion Problems in Disguise
Many organisations focus on retention through pay, benefits, or engagement initiatives - all important, but often incomplete.
What’s frequently missed is this:
People don’t usually leave because they aren’t capable.
They leave because the environment isn’t working for how their brain works.
When neurodivergent needs go unrecognised or unsupported, people adapt, mask, and compensate - until they can’t anymore. What looks like a “performance issue” or “attitude problem” is often a nervous system under strain.
Retention problems, more often than not, are inclusion problems in disguise.
This Isn’t About Diagnosis or Labels
Effective neuroinclusive practice isn’t about turning managers into clinicians or expecting organisations to have all the answers.
It’s not about diagnosis-led support.
And it’s not about one-size-fits-all adjustments.
It is about:
understanding how neurodivergent needs commonly show up at work
recognising stress signals early
knowing what reasonable, practical support looks like day-to-day
and giving managers clarity on where their responsibility begins and ends
When managers are given simple, needs-led frameworks, fear reduces. Confidence grows. And small adjustments prevent big problems.
The Shift That Changes Everything
The organisations making the most progress aren’t doing anything radical.
They’re shifting from:
reactive to preventative
individual blame to shared understanding
silence to confident, informed conversations
This work doesn’t need to be complex.
But it does need to be intentional.
When businesses invest in practical neurodiversity education — not just awareness — they protect people and performance at the same time.
And that’s when inclusion stops being a risk, and starts becoming a strength.
